Less and Sass are so different but you can’t do without them
On the market, the Less technology is no less popular than its opponent. It is used to create reliable and reusable libraries. These libraries allow the preprocessor software to stay current. Sass, for its part, gives users a compass that straightens out difficult situations in advance. The differences between the two preprocessors are many, so the debate over which one to choose will be ongoing for years to come. One works better with media queries, the other processes data faster. One performs its actions on the client side, the other loads the server and requires a lot of space. It’s up to each individual to figure it all out. The details and intricacies of each preprocessor will help in making the decision.
A little bit of specifics
Among the community of web designers, you can see two camps of supporters of CSS Less, Sass. Each has its own arguments in favor of one preprocessor and disadvantages of the other. Fortunately, the war between them will not happen. On the question of which one is better or worse, which is worth taking and which is worth giving up, it is very difficult to find the right answer. Therefore, we recommend to work with each of them, study the features, gain experience in the work and become a member of the third camp, which believes that both Sass and Less are essential for development.
After all, you’ll have to make a decision based not only on your own preferences as a developer, but also take into account the requirements of the project you’ll be working on. Knowing how to work with both preprocessors will enable you to offer your client the best solution and meet all their expectations for their project. This will raise your value and importance in the developer market, and you will reach new heights of professionalism.